1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 356 S.C.
  5. 356 S.C. 111 (2003)
 

BRAY v. MARATHON CORP.

No. 25733.

356 S.C. 111 (2003)

588 S.E.2d 93

Marilyn BRAY and Allan Bray, Petitioners/Respondents, v. MARATHON CORPORATION, an Alabama Corporation, American Refuse Systems, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, John Doe and Richard Roe, Defendants, of whom MARATHON CORPORATION, an Alabama Corporation, and American Refuse Systems, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, are Respondents/Petitioners.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided October 13, 2003.

Rehearing Denied November 19, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray Pratt McClain, of Charleston, and Ronald J. Jebaily, of Jebaily, Glass & Meacham, of Florence, for petitioners/respondents.

Gray T. Culbreath and Ellen M. Adams, both of Collins & Lacy, of Columbia, for respondent/petitioner Marathon Corporation.

Saunders M. Bridges, of Aiken, Bridges, Nunn, Elliott & Tyler, of Florence, for respondent/petitioner American Refuse Systems, Inc.

Justice MOORE:

We granted this writ of certiorari to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred by affirming in part and reversing in part the trial court's decision granting summary judgment on petitioner/respondent Marilyn Bray's products liability claims. Bray v. Marathon Corp., 347 S.C. 189, 553 S.E.2d 477 (Ct. App.2001). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases